U.S. Foreign Policy
Since its founding in 1922, Foreign Affairs has been the leading forum for serious conversation of American foreign policy and global affairs. The publication has actually included contributions from many leading worldwide affairs specialists.

More Resources

- Feedback
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Gift a Membership
- About Us
- Events
- Issue Archive
- Advertise
- Audio Content
- Account Management
- FAQs
Spy vs. AI

ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior operational functions in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, including as its very first Chief Risk Officer.

- More by Anne Neuberger
Spy vs. AI

How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage

Anne Neuberger

-.
Copy Link Copied. Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-[ai](https://astrapharm.ru). Copy


Gift Link Copied. This is a subscriber-only function. Subscribe now or Check in.


Create Citation Copied. Chicago MLA APSA APA. Chicago Cite not available at the moment. MLA Cite not available at the moment. APSA Cite not available at the moment. APA Cite not available at the minute


Download PDF. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Sign in.


Request Reprint. Request reprint permissions here.




In the early 1950s, the United States dealt with a critical intelligence obstacle in its blossoming competition with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance images from World War II might no longer supply adequate intelligence about Soviet military capabilities, and existing U.S. surveillance abilities were no longer able to penetrate the Soviet Union's closed airspace. This deficiency stimulated an audacious moonshot initiative: the advancement of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In just a couple of years, U-2 missions were delivering essential intelligence, recording pictures of Soviet rocket installations in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.

Today, the United States stands at a similar point. Competition in between Washington and its competitors over the future of the global order is intensifying, scientific-programs.science and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States should benefit from its world-class personal sector and ample capability for development to outcompete its foes. The U.S. intelligence neighborhood must harness the nation's sources of strength to provide insights to policymakers at the speed of today's world. The integration of expert system, particularly through large language models, provides groundbreaking opportunities to enhance intelligence operations and analysis, allowing the delivery of faster and more pertinent support to decisionmakers. This technological revolution features substantial disadvantages, however, specifically as foes exploit comparable advancements to uncover and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States must challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, first to protect itself from opponents who may use the technology for ill, and initially to use AI in line with the laws and worths of a democracy.

For the U.S. nationwide security community, fulfilling the pledge and handling the danger of AI will require deep technological and cultural modifications and a willingness to alter the method companies work. The U.S. intelligence and military neighborhoods can harness the potential of AI while mitigating its intrinsic dangers, ensuring that the United States maintains its competitive edge in a rapidly developing global landscape. Even as it does so, the United States should transparently convey to the American public, and to populations and partners around the world, how the nation plans to fairly and securely use AI, in compliance with its laws and worths.

MORE, BETTER, FASTER

AI's capacity to revolutionize the intelligence community lies in its ability to process and evaluate large amounts of information at unmatched speeds. It can be challenging to evaluate large amounts of gathered information to create time-sensitive warnings. U.S. intelligence services might take advantage of AI systems' pattern acknowledgment capabilities to recognize and alert human experts to potential risks, such as rocket launches or military motions, or crucial global developments that analysts understand senior U.S. decisionmakers are interested in. This capability would guarantee that vital cautions are timely, actionable, and pertinent, enabling more efficient actions to both quickly emerging hazards and emerging policy chances. Multimodal designs, which integrate text, images, and audio, enhance this analysis. For instance, using AI to cross-reference satellite imagery with signals intelligence could supply a detailed view of military movements, making it possible for quicker and more accurate threat evaluations and potentially brand-new ways of providing details to policymakers.

Intelligence experts can likewise offload repeated and lengthy tasks to machines to concentrate on the most fulfilling work: producing original and much deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence community's total insights and performance. A fine example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence agencies invested early in AI-powered capabilities, and the bet has paid off. The abilities of language designs have actually grown progressively advanced and recently released o1 and o3 designs demonstrated significant development in accuracy and reasoning ability-and can be utilized to much more rapidly equate and sum up text, audio, and video files.

Although challenges remain, future systems trained on higher amounts of non-English data might be capable of critical subtle distinctions in between dialects and comprehending the significance and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By depending on these tools, the intelligence community might concentrate on training a cadre of highly specialized linguists, it-viking.ch who can be hard to find, often struggle to make it through the clearance process, and take a long time to train. And naturally, by making more foreign language products available across the ideal companies, U.S. intelligence services would have the ability to more quickly triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they receive to select the needles in the haystack that actually matter.

The worth of such speed to policymakers can not be underestimated. Models can quickly sort through intelligence data sets, open-source details, and standard human intelligence and produce draft summaries or initial analytical reports that analysts can then validate and fine-tune, guaranteeing the end products are both detailed and accurate. Analysts might team up with an innovative AI assistant to overcome analytical problems, test ideas, and brainstorm in a collaborative fashion, improving each iteration of their analyses and delivering ended up intelligence faster.

Consider Israel's experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, covertly got into a secret Iranian center and took about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran's nuclear activities between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli authorities, the Mossad gathered some 55,000 pages of files and an additional 55,000 files saved on CDs, consisting of pictures and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior officials placed immense pressure on intelligence professionals to produce detailed assessments of its material and whether it indicated an ongoing effort to develop an Iranian bomb. But it took these experts a number of months-and numerous hours of labor-to translate each page, evaluate it by hand for appropriate material, and incorporate that details into evaluations. With today's AI abilities, the first 2 steps in that process might have been achieved within days, maybe even hours, enabling analysts to understand and contextualize the intelligence rapidly.

Among the most interesting applications is the way AI could change how intelligence is consumed by policymakers, enabling them to interact straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such capabilities would enable users to ask specific questions and receive summarized, relevant details from countless reports with source citations, assisting them make notified decisions quickly.

BRAVE NEW WORLD

Although AI offers many advantages, it also poses significant new dangers, especially as foes establish comparable technologies. China's developments in AI, especially in computer system vision and surveillance, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the nation is ruled by an authoritarian program, it does not have personal privacy constraints and civil liberty protections. That deficit allows large-scale data collection practices that have actually yielded information sets of immense size. Government-sanctioned AI models are trained on huge amounts of individual and behavioral information that can then be utilized for different purposes, such as surveillance and social control. The existence of Chinese business, such as Huawei, in telecoms systems and software application all over the world might offer China with ready access to bulk data, significantly bulk images that can be used to train facial acknowledgment models, a particular issue in nations with big U.S. military bases. The U.S. nationwide security community should think about how Chinese designs constructed on such comprehensive information sets can provide China a strategic advantage.

And it is not simply China. The proliferation of "open source" AI designs, such as Meta's Llama and those developed by the French business Mistral AI and the Chinese business DeepSeek, is putting effective AI capabilities into the hands of users across the world at fairly affordable expenses. A lot of these users are benign, however some are not-including authoritarian programs, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign stars are using big language designs to rapidly produce and spread incorrect and destructive content or to perform cyberattacks. As experienced with other intelligence-related technologies, such as signals obstruct abilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, and Russia will have every incentive to share a few of their AI developments with customer states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary company, therefore increasing the hazard to the United States and its allies.

The U.S. military and intelligence community's AI designs will end up being appealing targets for enemies. As they grow more effective and main to U.S. nationwide security decision-making, intelligence AIs will end up being critical nationwide possessions that need to be safeguarded against enemies seeking to compromise or control them. The intelligence community should purchase establishing safe and secure AI designs and in establishing requirements for "red teaming" and thatswhathappened.wiki continuous assessment to protect against possible threats. These groups can utilize AI to mimic attacks, discovering prospective weaknesses and developing strategies to alleviate them. Proactive procedures, including collaboration with allies on and financial investment in counter-AI technologies, will be vital.

THE NEW NORMAL

These difficulties can not be wished away. Waiting too wish for AI technologies to fully mature carries its own threats; U.S. intelligence capabilities will fall behind those of China, Russia, ura.cc and other powers that are going complete steam ahead in developing AI. To guarantee that intelligence-whether time-sensitive warnings or longer-term strategic insight-continues to be a benefit for the United States and its allies, the country's intelligence neighborhood requires to adjust and innovate. The intelligence services should rapidly master the use of AI innovations and make AI a fundamental aspect in their work. This is the only sure way to ensure that future U.S. presidents get the very best possible intelligence assistance, remain ahead of their enemies, and safeguard the United States' delicate capabilities and operations. Implementing these modifications will require a cultural shift within the intelligence community. Today, intelligence experts mainly develop items from raw intelligence and information, with some assistance from existing AI models for voice and imagery analysis. Progressing, intelligence authorities should explore including a hybrid approach, in line with existing laws, using AI models trained on unclassified commercially available data and improved with classified details. This amalgam of technology and conventional intelligence gathering might result in an AI entity providing direction to imagery, signals, open source, and measurement systems on the basis of an integrated view of normal and anomalous activity, automated images analysis, and automatic voice translation.

To accelerate the shift, intelligence leaders must promote the advantages of AI combination, highlighting the enhanced abilities and efficiency it provides. The cadre of freshly selected chief AI officers has been established in U.S. intelligence and defense to act as leads within their companies for promoting AI development and eliminating barriers to the innovation's execution. Pilot tasks and early wins can build momentum and confidence in AI's capabilities, encouraging broader adoption. These officers can utilize the competence of national labs and other partners to check and refine AI designs, guaranteeing their efficiency and security. To institutionalize change, leaders must produce other organizational incentives, including promotions and training opportunities, to reward inventive approaches and those staff members and units that demonstrate efficient usage of AI.

The White House has created the policy required for making use of AI in national security firms. President Joe Biden's 2023 executive order concerning safe, protected, setiathome.berkeley.edu and reliable AI detailed the assistance required to fairly and securely use the innovation, and National Security Memorandum 25, released in October 2024, is the nation's fundamental method for utilizing the power and handling the threats of AI to advance nationwide security. Now, Congress will need to do its part. Appropriations are needed for departments and firms to develop the facilities required for development and experimentation, conduct and scale pilot activities and assessments, and continue to invest in examination capabilities to make sure that the United States is building reliable and high-performing AI technologies.

Intelligence and military neighborhoods are dedicated to keeping human beings at the heart of AI-assisted decision-making and have created the structures and tools to do so. Agencies will require guidelines for how their experts ought to use AI designs to make certain that intelligence items fulfill the intelligence neighborhood's standards for dependability. The government will also need to maintain clear assistance for managing the data of U.S. citizens when it pertains to the training and usage of big language designs. It will be essential to stabilize making use of emerging technologies with protecting the privacy and civil liberties of people. This suggests augmenting oversight mechanisms, upgrading relevant structures to show the abilities and dangers of AI, and promoting a culture of AI development within the national security apparatus that harnesses the capacity of the innovation while protecting the rights and flexibilities that are fundamental to American society.

Unlike the 1950s, when U.S. intelligence raced to the leading edge of overhead and satellite images by establishing a number of the key innovations itself, winning the AI race will require that neighborhood to reimagine how it partners with private market. The economic sector, which is the main methods through which the federal government can realize AI progress at scale, is investing billions of dollars in AI-related research study, information centers, and computing power. Given those companies' developments, intelligence agencies ought to prioritize leveraging commercially available AI designs and refining them with classified data. This technique makes it possible for the intelligence community to rapidly broaden its abilities without having to begin from scratch, enabling it to remain competitive with enemies. A recent partnership between NASA and IBM to produce the world's biggest geospatial foundation model-and the subsequent release of the design to the AI community as an open-source project-is an exemplary demonstration of how this type of public-private collaboration can work in practice.

As the national security neighborhood incorporates AI into its work, it needs to make sure the security and durability of its designs. Establishing standards to release generative AI securely is crucial for maintaining the integrity of AI-driven intelligence operations. This is a core focus of the National Security Agency's new AI Security Center and its cooperation with the Department of Commerce's AI Safety Institute.

As the United States faces growing competition to form the future of the worldwide order, it is urgent that its intelligence firms and military take advantage of the nation's development and leadership in AI, focusing especially on big language models, to supply faster and more pertinent details to policymakers. Only then will they gain the speed, breadth, and depth of insight needed to navigate a more complex, competitive, and content-rich world.