Gotchas
The purpose of this guide is to document potential "gotchas" that contributors might encounter or should avoid during development of GitLab CE and EE.
Do not assert against the absolute value of a sequence-generated attribute
Consider the following factory:
FactoryBot.define do
factory :label do
sequence(:title) { |n| "label#{n}" }
end
end
Consider the following API spec:
require 'spec_helper'
describe API::Labels do
it 'creates a first label' do
create(:label)
get api("/projects/#{project.id}/labels", user)
expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
expect(json_response.first['name']).to eq('label1')
end
it 'creates a second label' do
create(:label)
get api("/projects/#{project.id}/labels", user)
expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
expect(json_response.first['name']).to eq('label1')
end
end
When run, this spec doesn't do what we might expect:
1) API::API reproduce sequence issue creates a second label
Failure/Error: expect(json_response.first['name']).to eq('label1')
expected: "label1"
got: "label2"
(compared using ==)
This is because FactoryBot sequences are not reset for each example.
Please remember that sequence-generated values exist only to avoid having to explicitly set attributes that have a uniqueness constraint when using a factory.
Solution
If you assert against a sequence-generated attribute's value, you should set it explicitly. Also, the value you set shouldn't match the sequence pattern.
For instance, using our :label
factory, writing create(:label, title: 'foo')
is ok, but create(:label, title: 'label1')
is not.
Following is the fixed API spec:
require 'spec_helper'
describe API::Labels do
it 'creates a first label' do
create(:label, title: 'foo')
get api("/projects/#{project.id}/labels", user)
expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
expect(json_response.first['name']).to eq('foo')
end
it 'creates a second label' do
create(:label, title: 'bar')
get api("/projects/#{project.id}/labels", user)
expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
expect(json_response.first['name']).to eq('bar')
end
end
expect_any_instance_of
or allow_any_instance_of
in RSpec
Avoid using Why
-
Because it is not isolated therefore it might be broken at times.
-
Because it doesn't work whenever the method we want to stub was defined in a prepended module, which is very likely the case in EE. We could see error like this:
1.1) Failure/Error: expect_any_instance_of(ApplicationSetting).to receive_messages(messages) Using `any_instance` to stub a method (elasticsearch_indexing) that has been defined on a prepended module (EE::ApplicationSetting) is not supported.
expect_next_instance_of
or allow_next_instance_of
Alternative: Instead of writing:
# Don't do this:
expect_any_instance_of(Project).to receive(:add_import_job)
# Don't do this:
allow_any_instance_of(Project).to receive(:add_import_job)
We could write:
# Do this:
expect_next_instance_of(Project) do |project|
expect(project).to receive(:add_import_job)
end
# Do this:
allow_next_instance_of(Project) do |project|
allow(project).to receive(:add_import_job)
end
If we also want to initialize the instance with some particular arguments, we could also pass it like:
# Do this:
expect_next_instance_of(MergeRequests::RefreshService, project, user) do |refresh_service|
expect(refresh_service).to receive(:execute).with(oldrev, newrev, ref)
end
This would expect the following:
# Above expects:
refresh_service = MergeRequests::RefreshService.new(project, user)
refresh_service.execute(oldrev, newrev, ref)
rescue Exception
Do not See "Why is it bad style to rescue Exception => e
in Ruby?".
Note: This rule is enforced automatically by Rubocop.
Do not use inline JavaScript in views
Using the inline :javascript
Haml filters comes with a
performance overhead. Using inline JavaScript is not a good way to structure your code and should be avoided.
Note: We've removed these two filters in an initializer.
Further reading
- Stack Overflow: Why you should not write inline JavaScript
Auto loading
Rails auto-loading on development
differs from the load policy in the production
environment.
In development mode, config.eager_load
is set to false
, which means classes
are loaded as needed. With the classic Rails autoloader, it is known that this can lead to
Rails resolving the wrong class
if the class name is ambiguous. This can be fixed by specifying the complete namespace to the class.
Error prone example
# app/controllers/application_controller.rb
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
...
end
# app/controllers/projects/application_controller.rb
class Projects::ApplicationController < ApplicationController
...
private
def project
...
end
end
# app/controllers/projects/submodule/some_controller.rb
module Projects
module Submodule
class SomeController < ApplicationController
def index
@some_id = project.id
end
end
end
end
In this case, if for any reason the top level ApplicationController
is loaded but Projects::ApplicationController
is not, ApplicationController
would be resolved to ::ApplicationController
and then the project
method will
be undefined and we will get an error.
Solution
# app/controllers/projects/submodule/some_controller.rb
module Projects
module Submodule
class SomeController < Projects::ApplicationController
def index
@some_id = project.id
end
end
end
end
By specifying Projects::
, we tell Rails exactly what class we are referring
to and we would avoid the issue.
NOTE: Note: This problem will disappear as soon as we upgrade to Rails 6 and use the Zeitwerk autoloader.
Further reading
- Rails Guides: Autoloading and Reloading Constants (Classic Mode)
- Ruby Constant lookup: Everything you ever wanted to know about constant lookup in Ruby
- Rails 6 and Zeitwerk autoloader: Understanding Zeitwerk in Rails 6