Spy Vs. AI
U.S. Diplomacy
Since its founding in 1922, Foreign Affairs has been the leading forum for severe conversation of American foreign policy and worldwide affairs. The magazine has featured contributions from numerous prominent worldwide affairs experts.
More Resources
- Feedback
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Gift a Membership
- About Us
- Events
- Issue Archive
- Advertise
- Audio Content
- Account Management
- FAQs
Spy vs. AI
ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior functional roles in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, including as its first Chief Risk Officer.
- More by Anne Neuberger
Spy vs. AI
How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage
Anne Neuberger
-.
Copy Link Copied.
Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-[ai](https://jobs.assist-staffing.com).
Copy
Gift Link Copied.
This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Check in.
Create Citation Copied.
Chicago MLA APSA APA.
Chicago Cite not available at the moment.
MLA Cite not available at the minute.
APSA Cite not available at the moment.
APA Cite not available at the moment
Download PDF.
This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Check in.
Request Reprint.
Request reprint consents here.
In the early 1950s, the United States dealt with a crucial intelligence challenge in its growing competition with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance pictures from The second world war could no longer provide adequate intelligence about Soviet military abilities, and existing U.S. security capabilities were no longer able to penetrate the Soviet Union's closed airspace. This deficiency stimulated an audacious moonshot initiative: the advancement of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In just a couple of years, U-2 missions were providing essential intelligence, recording pictures of Soviet missile installations in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.
Today, the United States stands at a comparable juncture. Competition in between Washington and its rivals over the future of the international order is heightening, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States must take advantage of its first-rate personal sector and adequate capability for development to outcompete its adversaries. The U.S. intelligence neighborhood should harness the nation's sources of strength to deliver insights to policymakers at the speed these days's world. The integration of expert system, particularly through big language models, uses groundbreaking chances to improve intelligence operations and analysis, enabling the delivery of faster and more appropriate support to decisionmakers. This technological revolution includes substantial disadvantages, however, especially as foes exploit comparable improvements to uncover and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States need to challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, initially to secure itself from opponents who may use the technology for ill, and initially to utilize AI in line with the laws and worths of a democracy.
For the U.S. national security neighborhood, fulfilling the pledge and handling the hazard of AI will need deep technological and cultural changes and a determination to alter the way companies work. The U.S. intelligence and military communities can harness the potential of AI while mitigating its intrinsic risks, guaranteeing that the United States maintains its one-upmanship in a rapidly progressing international landscape. Even as it does so, the United States must transparently communicate to the American public, and to populations and partners all over the world, how the nation intends to fairly and safely utilize AI, in compliance with its laws and worths.
MORE, BETTER, FASTER
AI's capacity to reinvent the intelligence neighborhood lies in its capability to process and evaluate vast quantities of information at unmatched speeds. It can be challenging to analyze big amounts of gathered data to create time-sensitive warnings. U.S. intelligence services might utilize AI systems' pattern recognition abilities to identify and alert human analysts to possible dangers, such as missile launches or military movements, or essential international advancements that analysts understand senior U.S. decisionmakers are interested in. This ability would make sure that vital cautions are timely, actionable, and appropriate, allowing for more reliable responses to both quickly emerging hazards and emerging policy opportunities. Multimodal models, which incorporate text, images, and audio, enhance this analysis. For example, utilizing AI to cross-reference satellite images with signals intelligence could supply a detailed view of military movements, allowing quicker and more precise threat assessments and possibly new ways of providing details to policymakers.
Intelligence analysts can also unload repetitive and lengthy jobs to makers to concentrate on the most fulfilling work: generating original and much deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence neighborhood's general insights and productivity. A good example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence firms invested early in AI-powered abilities, and the bet has actually paid off. The capabilities of language designs have grown progressively sophisticated and accurate-OpenAI's just recently launched o1 and o3 models demonstrated significant development in accuracy and thinking ability-and can be used to even more quickly equate and summarize text, audio, and video files.
Although challenges remain, future systems trained on higher quantities of non-English data might be capable of discerning subtle differences between dialects and understanding the meaning and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By depending on these tools, the intelligence community could concentrate on training a cadre of highly specialized linguists, mariskamast.net who can be hard to find, frequently struggle to get through the clearance process, and take a long time to train. And obviously, by making more foreign language products available across the ideal companies, U.S. intelligence services would have the ability to quicker triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they get to select the needles in the haystack that truly matter.
The worth of such speed to policymakers can not be ignored. Models can promptly sift through intelligence information sets, open-source details, and standard human intelligence and produce draft summaries or preliminary analytical reports that analysts can then validate and fine-tune, ensuring the final products are both detailed and precise. Analysts could team up with an innovative AI assistant to work through analytical problems, test ideas, and brainstorm in a collective fashion, enhancing each model of their analyses and providing ended up intelligence more rapidly.
Consider Israel's experience in January 2018, links.gtanet.com.br when its intelligence service, the Mossad, covertly got into a secret Iranian center and took about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran's nuclear activities in between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli officials, the Mossad gathered some 55,000 pages of documents and an additional 55,000 files kept on CDs, including photos and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior authorities positioned immense pressure on intelligence professionals to produce detailed assessments of its content and whether it pointed to a continuous effort to construct an Iranian bomb. But it took these experts numerous months-and numerous hours of labor-to translate each page, evaluate it by hand for relevant content, and incorporate that details into evaluations. With today's AI abilities, the first 2 steps in that procedure might have been achieved within days, perhaps even hours, enabling analysts to comprehend and contextualize the intelligence rapidly.
Among the most interesting applications is the method AI could change how intelligence is consumed by policymakers, allowing them to engage straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such capabilities would permit users to ask particular concerns and get summed up, pertinent details from thousands of reports with source citations, assisting them make informed choices quickly.
BRAVE NEW WORLD
Although AI offers many advantages, it also presents substantial brand-new threats, especially as adversaries establish similar innovations. China's developments in AI, particularly in computer system vision and monitoring, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the country is ruled by an authoritarian regime, it does not have privacy constraints and civil liberty securities. That deficit makes it possible for massive information collection practices that have yielded information sets of immense size. Government-sanctioned AI designs are trained on huge amounts of personal and behavioral data that can then be utilized for various purposes, such as security and social control. The presence of Chinese companies, such as Huawei, in telecommunications systems and software application worldwide might supply China with all set access to bulk information, notably bulk images that can be used to train facial recognition designs, a specific concern in nations with big U.S. military bases. The U.S. national security community need to consider how Chinese designs constructed on such comprehensive data sets can give China a strategic benefit.
And it is not simply China. The proliferation of "open source" AI designs, such as Meta's Llama and those developed by the French company Mistral AI and the Chinese business DeepSeek, is putting powerful AI capabilities into the hands of users around the world at fairly budget-friendly expenses. A number of these users are benign, but some are not-including authoritarian regimes, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign stars are utilizing big language designs to quickly generate and spread out false and malicious content or to conduct cyberattacks. As seen with other intelligence-related innovations, such as signals intercept abilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, and Russia will have every incentive to share a few of their AI breakthroughs with client states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary company, thus increasing the risk to the United States and its allies.
The U.S. military and intelligence neighborhood's AI models will become appealing targets for enemies. As they grow more effective and main to U.S. nationwide security decision-making, intelligence AIs will become critical nationwide properties that should be safeguarded against adversaries looking for to compromise or control them. The intelligence community need to purchase establishing protected AI models and in establishing standards for "red teaming" and continuous assessment to safeguard against possible dangers. These groups can use AI to replicate attacks, revealing possible weaknesses and developing strategies to mitigate them. Proactive procedures, consisting of collaboration with allies on and financial investment in counter-AI technologies, will be important.
THE NEW NORMAL
These challenges can not be wanted away. Waiting too wish for AI innovations to fully mature carries its own dangers; U.S. intelligence capabilities will fall back those of China, Russia, and other powers that are going full steam ahead in developing AI. To make sure that intelligence-whether time-sensitive cautions or longer-term strategic insight-continues to be a benefit for the United States and its allies, the country's intelligence neighborhood needs to adapt and innovate. The intelligence services need to quickly master the usage of AI innovations and make AI a fundamental aspect in their work. This is the only sure method to ensure that future U.S. presidents get the very best possible intelligence support, remain ahead of their foes, and protect the United States' delicate abilities and operations. Implementing these modifications will require a cultural shift within the intelligence neighborhood. Today, intelligence analysts mainly build products from raw intelligence and data, with some assistance from existing AI models for voice and images analysis. Moving forward, intelligence authorities must check out consisting of a hybrid approach, in line with existing laws, using AI models trained on unclassified commercially available information and refined with categorized details. This amalgam of innovation and standard intelligence event might result in an AI entity supplying instructions to imagery, signals, open source, and measurement systems on the basis of an incorporated view of regular and anomalous activity, automated images analysis, and automatic voice translation.
To speed up the transition, intelligence leaders need to promote the benefits of AI combination, emphasizing the enhanced capabilities and effectiveness it provides. The cadre of recently designated chief AI officers has been established in U.S. intelligence and defense to work as leads within their agencies for promoting AI development and getting rid of barriers to the technology's application. Pilot projects and early wins can build momentum and self-confidence in AI's capabilities, encouraging wider adoption. These officers can utilize the proficiency of nationwide laboratories and other partners to evaluate and fine-tune AI designs, guaranteeing their effectiveness and security. To institutionalize modification, leaders should develop other organizational incentives, consisting of promotions and training chances, to reward inventive approaches and those employees and systems that demonstrate reliable use of AI.
The White House has produced the policy required for making use of AI in national security firms. President Joe Biden's 2023 executive order relating to safe, secure, and trustworthy AI detailed the assistance needed to fairly and securely use the technology, and National Security Memorandum 25, released in October 2024, is the nation's fundamental method for harnessing the power and managing the risks of AI to advance nationwide security. Now, Congress will require to do its part. Appropriations are needed for departments and firms to produce the facilities required for innovation and experimentation, conduct and scale pilot activities and assessments, and continue to buy evaluation abilities to ensure that the United States is constructing reputable and high-performing AI technologies.
Intelligence and military communities are committed to keeping humans at the heart of AI-assisted decision-making and have actually created the frameworks and tools to do so. Agencies will need standards for how their analysts need to use AI models to make certain that intelligence items fulfill the intelligence neighborhood's standards for reliability. The government will also need to maintain clear assistance for handling the information of U.S. people when it pertains to the training and usage of big language models. It will be necessary to stabilize the use of emerging technologies with protecting the privacy and civil liberties of residents. This implies enhancing oversight mechanisms, upgrading relevant frameworks to show the capabilities and threats of AI, and fostering a culture of AI advancement within the nationwide security apparatus that harnesses the capacity of the innovation while safeguarding the rights and flexibilities that are foundational to American society.
Unlike the 1950s, when U.S. intelligence raced to the leading edge of overhead and satellite imagery by developing a lot of the crucial technologies itself, winning the AI race will need that neighborhood to reimagine how it partners with private industry. The economic sector, which is the main methods through which the government can recognize AI development at scale, is investing billions of dollars in AI-related research study, data centers, and calculating power. Given those companies' advancements, intelligence firms need to prioritize leveraging commercially available AI models and fine-tuning them with classified information. This approach enables the intelligence community to quickly broaden its capabilities without having to start from scratch, enabling it to remain competitive with enemies. A current partnership in between NASA and IBM to develop the world's biggest geospatial structure model-and the subsequent release of the design to the AI community as an open-source project-is an excellent demonstration of how this kind of public-private collaboration can operate in practice.
As the nationwide security neighborhood integrates AI into its work, it should make sure the security and resilience of its designs. Establishing standards to release generative AI securely is crucial for maintaining the of AI-driven intelligence operations. This is a core focus of the National Security Agency's new AI Security Center and its partnership with the Department of Commerce's AI Safety Institute.
As the United States faces growing rivalry to shape the future of the worldwide order, it is immediate that its intelligence firms and military take advantage of the nation's development and leadership in AI, focusing particularly on large language models, to supply faster and more pertinent details to policymakers. Only then will they gain the speed, breadth, and depth of insight needed to navigate a more complicated, competitive, and content-rich world.