Our new Deepseek-based AI says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl predictions from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting

Share this post

Nobody can anticipate the future however at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to provide it its best shot. With up to date news and a little however tough 14 Billion parameter design, opensourcebridge.science our AI is boldly anticipating the unforeseeable. Join us as we attempt to answer mankind's toughest questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, simply as two years back, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain many pressing questions that are less simple to pin down. Our company, Lightning Rod Labs, has been mining questions from locations like polymarket.com and kenpoguy.com training a large language design to be much better at forecasting the future (and have actually seen some intriguing improvements - research paper incoming). Today we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world subscribe to my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion specification design which is actually on the smaller sized side. (Some estimates suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from lots of months ago so we have actually built an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we offer the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unknown area to make its best prediction possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We posed the following questions to our AI and assessed its action. While we have actually seen prediction improvements from our training, use these quotes for prop wagering at your own hazard.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% possibility

Therefore it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, but a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposition ...

First, I'll take a look at the key points from the posts. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor given that 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been encouraging of his career, attending his games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even invited her good friends and family to the Super Bowl, revealing her dedication.

Some fans are thrilled, while others, especially Swifties, are a bit uncertain, especially offered comments Travis made about Donald Trump going to the Super Bowl. That has caused some Swifties to question how suitable Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship personal and not dealing with the speculation straight.

I believe the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive answers. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an important event, the chances and his actions suggest it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd approximate a low likelihood, perhaps around 5%, thinking about all elements.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the incredibly bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% chance

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its just a various front-tush being pressed. Will an AI understand asteroidsathome.net what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's similar attempts? Appears like our AI thinks they'll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this video game.

Alright, I'm attempting to find out the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I need to understand exactly what a "tush-push" is. From the articles, it looks like it's a strategy where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to press off defenders. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and technique.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to execute the relocation. The short article mentions that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is pretty high. ... I also need to think of the protective methods of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs know the Eagles' "tush-push" technique, they might change their defense appropriately, which might either increase or reduce the number of times the Eagles utilize it.

Considering that more than 5 looks like a significant number but possible offered their self-confidence, I would approximate a likelihood around 60-70% chance. This represents their preparation, confidence in the method, and the likelihood that they'll utilize it a number of times, especially if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime program efficiency?

AI Final Prediction: 65% possibility

While our AI may not be like us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling backward and forward, however in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to back down from a battle.

From the posts, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement throughout a previous halftime show when Trump was present in 2018. That appears significant since it reveals he's done it previously, so maybe he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more current posts, it points out that Lamar is moving away from political statements and focusing more on personal expression. That might mean he's less likely to resolve Trump this time.

However, he's likewise associated with a feud with Drake, which may offer him reasons to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal concerns surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a character assassination fit from Drake, so perhaps he bewares about including any questionable tunes in the efficiency. But considering that he won the Grammys for that track, he might still desire to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent occasion, Lamar might feel compelled to make a statement. However, the NFL tends to prevent political declarations during the halftime program, so there's a danger that such content might be limited or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making vibrant carry on huge stages. He's the very first solo rap act to heading the halftime program, which might offer him more innovative freedom. Plus, his previous behavior recommends he's not shy about expressing his viewpoints, even in public performances.

But I likewise remember reading that Lamar expressed fatigue about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might show he's less inspired to raise Trump this time around, particularly if he's concentrating on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, current shifts in focus, legal concerns, and the occasion's context-the likelihood seems to be moderately high, maybe around 65%.

Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the very bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% opportunity

Lets be honest, Andy Reid enjoys cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the reality that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh hamburger taint its prediction? Appears like theres somewhat of a possibility that if the chiefs taste success, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, saying he didn't imply to cause offense and that he really found it funny himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which might show he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Taking a look at the short articles, it discusses that Andy Reid is a food lover and loves cheeseburgers. There's a post specifically about his love for food, which suggests that he's an individual who takes pleasure in eating, particularly with his group. So, if there were strategies to celebrate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, particularly if the circumstance is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% chance

"Tails never fails?" You can't fool the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been predicting the coin toss and 53% are anticipating heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 incredibly bowls. Potentially financially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be deceived and thinks anything can take place when that coin enters the air.

Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the possibility that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, but there's some historical information that might affect this forecast.

First, I go through the short articles supplied. They all point out the historical statistics of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has come up more typically than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the outcome 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a slight edge, but it's not a big difference.

However, I keep in mind that the result of a coin toss is normally considered random. The small historical edge for tails could be due to possibility. But when making predictions, demo.qkseo.in sometimes individuals weigh historical information even if it's not statistically significant. So, I ought to consider whether this historical predisposition ought to affect the probability.

After believing about it, I choose that while the historical data reveals a minor choice for tails, it's not statistically substantial adequate to move the probability away from 0.5. So, I'll choose 0.5 as the likelihood, acknowledging that the slight historic edge exists however doesn't override the fact that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% chance

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would probably believe the very same. BUT, its official now since our AI says the possibilities are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still type of high when it pertains to scams on a nationwide scale). Appears like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm trying to figure out the probability that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite serious allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of articles that discuss conspiracy theories recommending referees are towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some questionable hire current games, specifically the AFC National championship. That does appear to spark some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get irritated when their team loses due to what they view as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "outrageous" and "ludicrous." They say there's no proof of organized bias. That's a strong statement from the individuals in charge. If they're rejecting it, it may imply there's no real basis or they would have addressed it in a different way if there was some truth to it.

Taking a look at the short articles, numerous sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They also pointed out that statistical analysis does not reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said information shows the Chiefs have been penalized more since 2022. That's intriguing due to the fact that if they were getting special treatment, you might expect fewer penalties, right?

...

So, putting it all together, the possibility that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely really low. Maybe not zero since you can't rule out every possibility, however incredibly not likely.

Summary

There you have it everybody, is it even worth viewing the video game still? I think I'll have to wait and see how the game ends up before we release this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for an excellent video game! And hey, if it turns out our AI was incorrect about everything, at least it can gain from this.