Superseding Indictment Charges Chinese National in Relation to Alleged Plan to Steal Proprietary AI Technology
A.gov website belongs to a main government organization in the United States.
Secure.gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// means you've securely linked to the.gov site. Share sensitive details just on authorities, safe websites.
- About - The Attorney general of the United States
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- Press Releases - Speeches - Videos - Photo Galleries - Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents - Forms
- Publications
- Details for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and asteroidsathome.net Contracts
- Why Justice? - Benefits - DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About - News
- Internships
- FOIA
- Contact
- Details for Journalists
- About - title=" About" About - The Chief law officer - Organizational Chart - Budget & Performance - History
-
Privacy Program
- title=" News" News - Press Releases - Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources - Guidance Documents - Forms
- Publications
- Details for Victims in Large Cases - Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Employment - Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices - Find Aid
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
- Office of Public Affairs
- News
- Press Releases
- Superseding Indictment Charges Chinese National In Relation To Alleged Plan To Steal Proprietary AI Technology
MENU News
- All News - Blogs - Photo Galleries - Podcasts - Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
Archived Press Releases
Archived News
Para Notícias en Español
Superseding Indictment Charges Chinese National in Relation to Alleged Plan to Steal Proprietary AI Technology
- Facebook - X. - LinkedIn.
- Email
Note: View the superseding indictment here.
A federal grand jury returned a superseding indictment today charging Linwei Ding, likewise known as Leon Ding, 38, with 7 counts of financial espionage and seven counts of theft of trade secrets in connection with a supposed plan to steal from Google LLC (Google) proprietary details associated with AI .
Ding was initially arraigned in March 2024 on 4 counts of theft of trade secrets. The superseding indictment returned today explains 7 classifications of trade tricks taken by Ding and charges Ding with 7 counts of financial espionage and seven counts of theft of trade secrets.
According to the superseding indictment, Google hired Ding as a software application engineer in 2019. Between around May 2022 and May 2023, Ding submitted more than 1,000 distinct files containing Google private details from Google's network to his individual Google Cloud account, including the trade tricks declared in the superseding indictment.
While Ding was employed by Google, he secretly affiliated himself with two People's Republic of China (PRC)- based innovation companies. Around June 2022, Ding remained in conversations to be the Chief Technology Officer for an early-stage innovation company based in the PRC. By May 2023, Ding had founded his own technology business concentrated on AI and artificial intelligence in the PRC and was functioning as the business's CEO.
The superseding indictment declares that Ding meant to benefit the PRC government by stealing trade secrets from Google. Ding allegedly took technology connecting to the hardware infrastructure and software application platform that enables Google's supercomputing information center to train and serve big AI models. The trade secrets contain detailed details about the architecture and functionality of Google's Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) chips and systems and Google's Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) systems, the software that permits the chips to interact and perform tasks, and the software application that manages countless chips into a supercomputer efficient in training and carrying out cutting-edge AI workloads. The trade tricks likewise pertain to Google's custom-designed SmartNIC, a type of network user interface card utilized to enhance Google's GPU, high efficiency, and cloud networking products.
As declared, Ding flowed a PowerPoint discussion to employees of his innovation company pointing out PRC national policies encouraging the advancement of the domestic AI industry. He also developed a PowerPoint discussion containing an application to a PRC skill program based in Shanghai. The superseding indictment explains how PRC-sponsored talent programs incentivize individuals engaged in research and advancement outside the PRC to transmit that understanding and research study to the PRC in exchange for salaries, research study funds, laboratory area, or other incentives. Ding's application for the talent program stated that his company's item "will assist China to have calculating power infrastructure abilities that are on par with the international level."
If founded guilty, Ding faces an optimum penalty of ten years in jail and approximately a $250,000 fine for classifieds.ocala-news.com each trade-secret count and 15 years in jail and $5,000,000 fine for each economic-espionage count. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory elements.
The FBI is investigating the case.
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Casey Boome and Molly K. Priedeman for king-wifi.win the Northern District of California and Trial Attorneys Stephen Marzen and Yifei Zheng of the National Security Division's Counterintelligence and Export Control Section are prosecuting the case.
Today's action was collaborated through the Justice and Commerce Departments' Disruptive Technology Strike Force. The Disruptive Technology Strike Force is an interagency police strike force co-led by the Departments of Justice and Commerce designed to target illegal stars, secure supply chains, and prevent vital technology from being obtained by authoritarian regimes and hostile nation-states.
A superseding indictment is simply a claims. All accuseds are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.