For Christmas I received an interesting present from a friend - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a couple of easy triggers about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's an interesting read, and extremely funny in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of composing, however it's likewise a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's prompts in collecting data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a strange, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, considering that pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can buy any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody producing one in anyone's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is planned as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get sold further.

He hopes to widen his range, creating different categories such as sci-fi, and maybe providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human customers.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are talking about data here, we in fact imply human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, annunciogratis.net it was still extremely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for innovative functions ought to be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without consent should be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely powerful but let's construct it morally and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to utilize developers' content on the internet to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, galgbtqhistoryproject.org health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise strongly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of happiness," states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor thatswhathappened.wiki to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening among its best performing industries on the vague guarantee of development."

A government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a practical strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to assist them certify their content, access to premium material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a national data library containing public information from a vast array of sources will also be made offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the security of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector required to share details of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to want the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a number of suits against AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for classifieds.ocala-news.com that reason exempt. There are a number of factors which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training data and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the many downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has lots of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather hard to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But given how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not sure how long I can remain confident that my significantly slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.